Posted on Jun 6, 2015
Why Is This Happening? The U.S. is obliged to go to war for 67 countries, including Cuba
2.75K
1
3
0
0
0
U.S. Army © John Moore/Getty Images U.S. Army
Thanks to a complicated mesh of treaties and other deals put in place since the end of World War II, the United States is (theoretically) obligated to defend 67 nations — comprising about a quarter of the world's population — in the event of war. This data comes from Tufts University political scientist Michael Beckley, who recently published a study entitled "The Myth of Entangling Alliances"
Some of the countries on the list are obvious (Israel and France, for example), while others, like Cuba, may come as a surprise. Of course, legal obligation does not necessarily translate to military action, particularly if our ally is not attacked within its own borders.
As Beckley notes, for the first 165 years of American history, the U.S. had just one mutual defense agreement, and founding fathers like Jefferson warned against entangling alliances. But Beckley concludes that today American wars are due less to these treaties and more to "the tendency of U.S. leaders to define national interests expansively, to exaggerate the magnitude of foreign threats, and to underestimate the costs of military intervention."
http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/IS3904_pp007-048.pdf
Thanks to a complicated mesh of treaties and other deals put in place since the end of World War II, the United States is (theoretically) obligated to defend 67 nations — comprising about a quarter of the world's population — in the event of war. This data comes from Tufts University political scientist Michael Beckley, who recently published a study entitled "The Myth of Entangling Alliances"
Some of the countries on the list are obvious (Israel and France, for example), while others, like Cuba, may come as a surprise. Of course, legal obligation does not necessarily translate to military action, particularly if our ally is not attacked within its own borders.
As Beckley notes, for the first 165 years of American history, the U.S. had just one mutual defense agreement, and founding fathers like Jefferson warned against entangling alliances. But Beckley concludes that today American wars are due less to these treaties and more to "the tendency of U.S. leaders to define national interests expansively, to exaggerate the magnitude of foreign threats, and to underestimate the costs of military intervention."
http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/IS3904_pp007-048.pdf
Government
Foreign Policy
Allies
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
The U.S. will go to war for 1 reason and 1 reason only: if it benefits the U.S. Class dismissed.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
The nuclear umbrella the U.S. provided many countries after WWII kept the spread of defensive nuclear armament to a minimum. As a result we have had 70 years of relative peace (no major wars between superpowers).
The alternative to these alliances would have been proliferation of nuclear arms among squabbling nations - and perhaps a series of nuclear exchanges.
I think our treaties are the better alternative.
The alternative to these alliances would have been proliferation of nuclear arms among squabbling nations - and perhaps a series of nuclear exchanges.
I think our treaties are the better alternative.
(0)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
Capt Seid Waddell, Sir, looking at it in that reasoning, I totally agree with you.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google