MAJ Private RallyPoint Member 543606 <div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>FAO Branch announced that the shift to combine 48C and 48E into one AOC, 48E, (and some 48E to 48D re-alignment, as well) was recently approved. <br /><br />On one hand, it appears logical to align areas of concentration with geographic combatant command areas of responsibility better. On the other hand, there was a lot of goodness in having the 48C/48E split.<br /><br />I suppose the biggest question I'd have is what happens if (when, really, I guess) AFRICOM is disbanded and split between EUCOM and CENTCOM. 2015-03-21T08:50:45-04:00 MAJ Private RallyPoint Member 543606

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>FAO Branch announced that the shift to combine 48C and 48E into one AOC, 48E, (and some 48E to 48D re-alignment, as well) was recently approved. <br /><br />On one hand, it appears logical to align areas of concentration with geographic combatant command areas of responsibility better. On the other hand, there was a lot of goodness in having the 48C/48E split.<br /><br />I suppose the biggest question I'd have is what happens if (when, really, I guess) AFRICOM is disbanded and split between EUCOM and CENTCOM.

2015-03-21T08:50:45-04:00 2015-03-21T08:50:45-04:00 MAJ Private RallyPoint Member 543614

<div class="images-v2-count-0"></div>This question posted twice for some reason (and the other post has errors). Can't seem to delete the other post. Apologies for any confusion.

2015-03-21T08:59:55-04:00 2015-03-21T08:59:55-04:00 2015-03-21T08:50:45-04:00