Should cell phones be allowed in the field?

I was assigned to a unit where during a fire fight the Soldier accidentally dialed his family and when his Mom answered the phone she heard the entire shootout. This could have caused his mother to have a heart attack. Cellphones were the topic of discussion in my shop Wednesday. Cellphones(government or personal) in the field can be a distraction. As a 1SG I would turn off my government and personal cellphone when in the field or on a range because I felt that if was something important the persons trying to contact me would call the range, call range control, or use the radio at the BN HQ to reach me. As a PSG I told my Soldiers, "You will not be on a cellphone on government time unless it was an emergency. We had things that must be completed and that cannot happen if you are chit chatting on your cell." Before cellphones leaders made sure to put out detailed information to Soldiers ensuring that they knew what needed to be done. It was mandatory that each Soldier have a green notebook or 3x5 cards and a pen which was given to you from supply. Cellphones while on mission/deployment can and has placed OPSEC in jeopardy.

The fact that someone can triangulate you because of your cell phone might be a consideration. Incoming can be hell if you are the target! lol

The ability to locate you with the cell phone regardless if it on or off, while the battery has power is a issue. Yeah, with these devices, how many soldiers still carry the notebook or cards and pen with them. When I was in they weren't issue, but we were required to have them just the same. As such as the issued phones for Commanders and such, I agree while in the field, they should be shut down, and even the battery taken out. There should be time, built into the schedule of the exercise where the Commander can and other who have to, due to mission requirement, can plug into the network, download and upload information, update documents and what not, check messages, and what not. If anyone needs to communicate with you, well they still have radio contact. If it is truly an emergency, and all other means of communication is failing, then use the Cell Phone to contact who you need to get help.

How did we ever manage??? LOL

I think it truly depends on the leadership bc we as NCOs and leaders are responsible for what our soldiers do and if they see us doing it then they will also

When the Army can figure out how to get with the year 2015 with there broken radios and half way operating JCR's then I still see a need for a cell phone. I can do more with my I-phone in the field than I can with a fully operational hummvee with commo equipment. Verizon can reach a lot farther than a retrans.

MSG (Join to see)

Hahahahaha

Yes. We have them down range. I once got pulled over on kandahar for driving and talking on my phone. 20 minutes earlier, I was in an M1051 with a computer in front of me, blue force tracker screen beside that, radio to convoy vehicles, radio to TOC, and an iPod blaring while blazing through afghan roads at night with a few bullets blazing by. Cop asked why I was talking and driving. Told him he was mistaken, I was training fort next big ride.

MSG Danny Ibarra, that was funny, but really it not joking matter to be distract while driving when you don't need to be. The one thing you should asked the Officer if he was watching his computer screen while he pulled you over. It is serious problem here, where people drive too fast, in too much traffic, and too distracted with radio and phone. Many States have add no Texting and Cell Phone usage law while driving, but in many cases, the local Law Enforcement Agencies don't enforce it as they should. They understand and support the reason and logic of these laws, but the reality of real world application is. They themselves with the computers, the radar guns, issued cell phones they have in their cars. They can be at time just as distracted if they are patrolling as a lone officer, while travelling in traffic. It is why it not uncommon to see Patrol Cars pulled over in the odd place with cop texting on their phone or the laptop. They can't perform their duties without using these devices, and sometimes it unavoidable that they are driving. With the use of the smart phones, they no longer have to use open radio channel, to give dispatch information, or to talk to their supervisors on information that shouldn't be broadcast in the open. Much like the secure links have been used in the Military for years.

Talk about information overload. iPod blaring adding to it, really, that is interesting. I Would think that would be the last thing some people would want in those situations. Don't know, wasn't there, can't say for myself that I would be all to comfortable with the add noise, if it would be too much noise to push me into information overload. Being that I have Asperger's it might be the one thing factor that push me over limit.

Yes, I can see the argument where is should be handle at lower level, but how low should it be handled at? As you go down the Chain of Command, every Commander is going to have difficulty not having the final say so, where as if the say so comes from above, they just have to follow it, or total ignore it if they chose that route too.

I mean if you go down to Company level, it doesn't help if one Company of a Battalion doesn't allow them, while all the others allow them. Then when you have Battalion-level Field Exercise where small elements are crossed attached/deteched with this Company that doesn't. What about the troops who are coming in from units that allow them, and they have their cell phones with them. Should they be discipline because they have them, since in their Company they are allowed. It only get worse as you work your way up the progressive Chain of Command, on who sets the policy at which level.

With that said, I think it would be ideally at Company-level. It is here where leadership see what the soldiers are using their phones for in the field exercises, and they have to live with decisions to allow or disallow them in the field. There will always be exercises where some higher HQ will say they will not be allowed, and that is the privilege for that Command element to state so. Yet, for most part, it should be Company Commander who sets the tone, he the one responsible for the morale and discipline of his unit at the end of the day. Let him along with his XO, Top, and other top advisers figure out what is best for his Company.

Col. Smallfield is spot on. Blanket policies can, in some cases, seem foolish and just lead people to ignore them for practical reasons.