What do you think about the Commander-in-Chief forum that was conducted with both candidates? Who do you believe did a better job and why?

I caught the latter half of Clinton............. I thought she had substantive, but wordy answers which obscured a lot of what she was trying to say for the most part- she did ok but not much more than that. Trump was an incoherent bag of mess and he upset me when he rebuked the female veteran on the number of suicides in the manner he did (very dismissive) and his comments about the Generals really irked me...... the rest was mish-mash ...... oh wait did you catch what he said about the classified briefings? not well thought thru answers on that- the correct answer would have been, cannot comment on any details of the classified briefings. All on all a good start for the first forum of this kind, but 1 hour was way too short

Once Lauer told Trump he couldn't attack Hillary but instead was to tell us what he himself thinks, he couldn't come up with anything coherent to say. It was cringeworthy and it would have been funny if there wasn't so much at stake.

You ask me excellent, excellent question, Captain (obscure Iron Sheik reference). I came in late and missed most of the Secretary's questions, but I'm pretty sure nothing she said would have made me think "Oh yeah, she has a point." I don't like her, I don't like her voice, I don't like her policy positions, and I don't like her past. Mr. Trump, in my opinion mishandled several questions, allowed the Matt Lauer to interrupt his answers way too much, and spent a bit too much time not answering questions, but saying things like "..... But Obama" or ".... She did _____________". We're pretty much in hell either way, it's more a question of which level of hell are we going to be in.