Posted on May 10, 2016
MSgt John McGowan
1.19K
0
5
0
0
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 4
MSgt James Mullis
0
0
0
Yes, However the likelihood that we will need to use "Tactical" Nuclear Weapons in the defense of the nation has never been greater.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Brian Mason
0
0
0
Besides the military there are millions of civilian firearm owners, like myself. Should we come under attack, I would first try and re-enlist into my MOS - 68W Combat Medic, despite being partially disabled. I'm sure every gun owner feels the same; in that they will also defend this country right along side the military.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
0
0
0
Our current model of "Defense" is through Global Stability. If you put "Brush Fires" out, you don't worry about "Forest Fires." The idea is that a much smaller military is needed which acts a global arm going where it is needed in a timely manner, rather than a larger one for "one off" purposes.
(0)
Comment
(0)
MSgt James Mullis
MSgt James Mullis
>1 y
And it works as long as you have a big (Nuclear) stick in the other hand. Just in case one of those brush fires gets out of hand.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close