Posted on Apr 19, 2016
What are your honest opinions on the new Force Distribution (Air Force)? Have you seen a positive or negative effect?
16.8K
19
14
4
4
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 10
I think it is stupid. They keep pushing tis "one team, one fight" B.S., and then make the EPR system cutthroat. Now it's whoever gets the most face time gets the 5.
(4)
(0)
I wondered if it was just my perception. It seemed that it was still the people who spent the time out of the shop that got the rate.
At the end of the day it isn't the person who knows you and sees your work day to day, it is the Commander who rates. I'm sure they do their best but they don't see what every person is doing, so if someone happens to work in the same office, or has an eloquent flight chief that can spin it the right way, they get the rate.
At the end of the day it isn't the person who knows you and sees your work day to day, it is the Commander who rates. I'm sure they do their best but they don't see what every person is doing, so if someone happens to work in the same office, or has an eloquent flight chief that can spin it the right way, they get the rate.
(3)
(0)
It is a hot chocolate steaming mess...what pisses me off abut it is that in my unit I have 4 guys who have one multiple wing level awards, outstanding in the community, tops in their career field. the next unit over has 4 guys who show up when they can, never volunteer, uniforms look like they just rolled out of the bar...etc. I only get one allocation and they get one allocation so three of my stellar performers get the shaft because one of the others get the other allocation...how is that right?
(2)
(0)
CMSgt (Join to see)
But that also means that commander isn't doing his job correctly, and arguably neither are the senior enlisted in that unit. The forced distribution authority does not have to use all of their allocations. Unfortunately, it doesn't mean that you get any more if they don't use theirs. But if that commander's leadership team were doing their jobs and not using their allocations if they don't have anyone deserving, that would put their crap bags in the same promote category as many of your stellar performers, and as long as your team has painted a stronger word picture in the EPR, then your guys will get the nod. The other fortunate thing, or unfortunate depending on your perspective, is that each commander has their own criteria for what they believe to be deserving of their promotion recommendation. If there's a crappy commander with low standards/expectations, then their underperforming airmen will still get the promotion recommendation, but if the commander's team has high standards...you get the picture. It's subjective from all angles.
IMHO, this is still better than throwing 95% of all airmen into one firewall 5 category and letting the system pick the winner. At least this way gives commanders *more* of a voice. It's still far from perfect, but I doubt there is a promotion system out there that doesn't have some inherent unfairness or subjectivity.
IMHO, this is still better than throwing 95% of all airmen into one firewall 5 category and letting the system pick the winner. At least this way gives commanders *more* of a voice. It's still far from perfect, but I doubt there is a promotion system out there that doesn't have some inherent unfairness or subjectivity.
(3)
(0)
Read This Next