Posted on Mar 1, 2016
SFC Tyrone Almendarez
4.59K
39
25
7
7
0
60ef326a
What happened to the Republican Party I knew? In the 1980 Republican Debate they they addressed illegal Immigration. Their answers were not know where near with the answers you hear now. It's like they sound like liberal Democrats. This Party now is something I no longer understand.
http://youtu.be/6gYHMwEdvIk
Posted in these groups: Republican logo Republicans6262122778 997339a086 z PoliticsImmigration logo Immigration
Avatar feed
Responses: 12
1SG Civil Affairs Specialist
6
6
0
This is not a settled issue in the Republican Party, and when they set their platform at the Convention, I expect it to be a contested plank. What to do with illegal residents currently in the United States divides many.
Personally, I think denying government benefits would solve the problem on the supply end.
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Tyler G.
3
3
0
I do weep for the Republican party, as my three favorite presidents of all time were Republicans: Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, and Dwight D. Eisenhower. I place the beginning of the fall of the Republican party somewhere between Nixon's and Reagan's administration. Whether it be their courting of the Evangelical Right, the starting of the war on drugs, or the introduction of trickle-down economics. The point is, somewhere along the line the Republican party ceased being for small and limited government. They got into peoples personal lives, started being for excessive military spending, and overall got away from their more libertarian roots.

Thankfully, libertarian is becoming more popular, in fact the Libertarian party might even eventually become a major party, drawing from both libertarian republicans and libertarian democrats as more and more people become fed up with the status quo.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SPC Melvin Thomason
SPC Melvin Thomason
>1 y
I agree, but they still use the term "FISCAL CONSERVATIVE". I guess I don't understand the meaning of that word. But, maybe they don't understand it either...
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Jack Durish
3
3
0
"Reagan's Amnesty" was a compromise. The Republicans wanted the secure borders. The Democrats wanted more voters on their roles. They compromised. The Democrats got their voters, but the Republicans didn't get their secure borders. That's the nature of compromise. You surrender your principles and get nothing in return.

Look at the Missouri Compromise. The Abolitionists wanted to halt the spread of slavery. The Democrats wanted to expand their "peculiar institution". They compromised and slavery continued. Only when the Abolitionists formed the Republican Party and stood by their principles was slavery ended, but the Democrats hung onto their "peculiar institution" without the chains. First with the Jim Crow laws, then with Johnson's Great Society. Thus blacks remain enslaved to this day. That too is the nature of compromise.

Now it seems that the GOP has become so accustomed to abandoning their principles they have joined the Democrats. Neither party has any principles. They have only ambition to take and keep power.

Who allowed this? We the People. We even encourage it. Who can change it? We the People. No one else.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close